Which statement is true regarding the claim of Solid Wood that Kristin failed to properly reject the goods?

A) Solid Wood is incorrect because under the UCC Kristin had 30 days in which to reject the goods.
B) Solid Wood is incorrect only if Kristin can establish that Let Us Help You miscalculated the amount of interest she owed.
C) Solid Wood is incorrect only if Kristin can show that the goods were overpriced.
D) Solid Wood is correct only if Solid Wood can show that the goods were priced at reasonable market value.
E) Solid Wood is correct.

Question

Deepali Sharma · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : E, Explanation :  Solid Wood's claim that Kristin failed to properly reject the goods is based on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) rules regarding the rejection of goods. The UCC allows for the rejection of goods under certain conditions, but it requires that rejection be made within a reasonable time and that the buyer notify the seller. Kristin's disagreement with the financing company over interest rates does not constitute a valid reason under the UCC for rejecting the goods 29 days after delivery. The UCC also imposes a duty of good faith on all parties involved in a transaction, contradicting Kristin's claim that there is no such duty. Therefore, her late rejection based on a dispute unrelated to the condition or delivery of the goods themselves does not align with the proper procedure for rejection under the UCC.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions