Asked by

Marisela Rodriguez
on Oct 21, 2024

verifed

Verified

The patient sued the hospital for malpractice after developing a postoperative DVT and PE.The nurse's notes did not state that TED hose and sequential compression devices (SCDs) were applied even though they were ordered.Why did the court rule in favor of the patient in the case?

A) DVT and PE can develop even if TED hose and SCDs are applied.
B) The patient was informed that DVT and PE are known surgical risks.
C) The nurse testified that SCDs and TED hose were applied as ordered.
D) The nurse failed to document that TED hose and SCDs were applied as ordered.

TED Hose

Thrombo-Embolus Deterrent Hose; specialized stockings designed to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis by applying graduated pressure on the legs.

Sequential Compression Devices (SCDs)

Medical devices designed to prevent venous thromboembolism by applying graduated compression to the legs to enhance blood flow.

DVT and PE

Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) refers to a blood clot in a deep vein, typically in the legs, which can lead to Pulmonary Embolism (PE) if the clot travels to the lungs.

  • Determine circumstances prone to malpractice legal action and grasp the essentials of proving malpractice.
verifed

Verified Answer

BR
Briyonna Rose'alynOct 24, 2024
Final Answer:
Get Full Answer