Assessing whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence best illustrates

A) critical thinking.
B) naturalistic observation.
C) the placebo effect.
D) the double-blind procedure.

Question

Assessing whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence best illustratesA) critical thinking.B) naturalistic observation.C) the placebo effect.D) the double-blind procedure.

Hannah Litts · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : A, Explanation :  Assessing whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence is a key aspect of critical thinking. Critical thinking involves carefully evaluating information and arguments to determine their validity and usefulness in making a sound judgment or decision. This process requires analyzing evidence, determining the strengths and weaknesses of different viewpoints, and considering the implications of various outcomes. Naturalistic observation, the placebo effect, and the double-blind procedure are all related to research methods and experimental design, but they do not directly address the question of whether conclusions are warranted by the evidence.

Assessing whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence best illustrates

A) critical thinking.
B) naturalistic observation.
C) the placebo effect.
D) the double-blind procedure.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions

Assessing whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence best illustratesA) critical thinking. B) naturalistic observation. C) the placebo effect. D) the double-blind procedure.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions

Assessing whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence best illustrates

A) critical thinking.
B) naturalistic observation.
C) the placebo effect.
D) the double-blind procedure.