Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) decreases the number of traffic fatalities by 10 percent.
B) decreases the number of traffic fatalities by 0.5 percent.
C) has no measurable effect on the number of traffic fatalities.
D) increases the number of traffic fatalities by 2 percent.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 55% of the market.
B) 65% of the market.
C) 70% of the market.
D) 80% of the market.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 1 only
B) 2 only
C) 3 only
D) 1, 2, and 3
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) reduces equilibrium output.
B) reduces pollution associated with the production of the good.
C) raises equilibrium price.
D) all of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Smith and Jones must be able to reduce pollution at exactly the same cost.
B) Smith and Jones must have different abatement costs.
C) Smith and Jones must have a social conscience and must be devoted to pollution abatement.
D) The government must direct Smith and Jones toward beneficial trades.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) is nonrival.
B) is not excludable.
C) is provided only by private sectors.
D) is consumed by a single person or household.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) if there are low-quality goods in the market, there will be fewer or no high-quality items.
B) if there are high-quality goods in the market, there will be fewer or no low-quality items.
C) the more low-quality goods there are in the market, the more high-quality goods there will be in the market.
D) if buyers are pessimistic about the percentage of low-quality goods on the market sellers of low-quality goods will be able to charge higher prices than if buyers had neutral beliefs.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 50
B) 60
C) 150
D) 200
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the firms cannot gain by trading the right to pollute.
B) both firms can benefit if Smith trades the right to increase pollution by 500 gallons to Jones for $30.
C) both firms can benefit if Smith trades the right to increase pollution by 500 gallons to Jones for $50.
D) both firms can benefit if Jones trades the right to increase pollution by 500 gallons to Smith for $30.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The marginal benefit of abatement is less than its marginal cost.
B) The marginal benefit of abatement is greater than its marginal cost.
C) The marginal benefit of abatement is equal to its marginal cost.
D) none of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a positive spillover.
B) moral hazard.
C) adverse selection.
D) irrational behavior.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) would decrease the price of coal.
B) would cause some producers to switch to other forms of energy.
C) is unlikely to affect the demand for alternative forms of energy.
D) would increase the quantity of coal demanded at every price.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) can benefit under a system of marketable pollution permits by trading the right to pollute.
B) will prefer a pollution tax to a system of marketable pollution permits.
C) will decrease the price of their product if taxed on the amount of pollution they emit.
D) will not be able to benefit from trading the right to pollute under a system of marketable pollution permits.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) increase; increase; increase
B) decrease; decrease; decrease
C) increase; decrease; increase
D) increase; decrease; decrease
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 416
Related Exams