A) negligence, but not intent
B) intent, but not negligence
C) neither intent or negligence; it requires fraud
D) deceit only
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a cost-benefit analysis
B) strict liability when any injury is inflicted
C) a risk-utility balancing
D) the rule of negligence
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Buick was only a dealer of automobiles, but still was responsible for the finished product
B) Buick was a wealthy enough company to afford paying damages
C) Buick was liable because it advertised that the wheels were safe on every vehicle
D) MacPherson's injuries were life-threatening
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) lose because their exposure was years ago and the statute of limitations has run out
B) lose because the injuries are associated with "ordinary diseases of life"
C) win if the manufacturer did not undertake tests to determine effects on users
D) win if the manufacturer engaged in misrepresentation
E) win based on express warranty in contract
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) one to two billion dollars
B) ten to twenty billion dollars
C) twenty to forty billion dollars
D) about a quarter trillion dollars
E) no estimates are available
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the cause of an intentional tort
B) carelessness in a legal sense
C) failure to file tax returns properly
D) a business term for an accident
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) intentional interference with contractual relations
B) unintentional interference with contractual relations
C) forced interference with contractual relations
D) interference with advantaged clients
E) interference with intent
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Morriss v. Akers
B) Greenman v. Yuba Power
C) MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company
D) MDM Group Associates v. CX Reinsurance Company
E) Johnson v. Chevrolet
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) fraud
B) manipulation of the securities market for personal gain
C) predatory behavior
D) defamation of a competitor
E) all of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) product injury law
B) product quality assurance law
C) product service law
D) consumer protection law
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) could only sue Emcare for breach of contract.
B) could only sue HMA for breach of contract.
C) could sue both Emcare and HMA for breach of contract.
D) could sue HMA for tortious interference with c contract.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) expiated
B) valid
C) explicit
D) rapid
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) $1 billion
B) $4 billion
C) $10 billion
D) $15 billion
E) $100 billion
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) could only sue Emcare for breach of contract.
B) could only sue HMA for breach of contract.
C) could sue both Emcare and HMA for breach of contract.
D) could sue Emcare for tortious interference with a contract.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) naïve user defense
B) smart user defense
C) intelligent user defense
D) informed user defense
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 81 - 100 of 361
Related Exams