Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

The most common defense to a claim of defamation is:


A) consent
B) proximate cause
C) protection of others
D) self-defense
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Proximate cause limits liability to harms:


A) whether foreseeable or not
B) resulting from remote occurrences "evolving naturally" from a central event
C) that result from non-negligent conduct
D) that arise from interaction with railroads
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In some states, such as California, proximate cause has been replaced by a negligence rule of liability that holds: A legal cause of injury is a cause which is a(n) ____ in bringing about the injury.


A) intervening conduct
B) superseding cause
C) sine qua non
D) contributory factor
E) none of the other choices are correct

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In an assault or battery tort case, consent:


A) must be witnessed by at least one witness of legal age
B) must be expressed with words
C) must be expressed in writing
D) must be expressed by all involved parties
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If you are walking to your car at night in a dark parking lot and a stranger steps from behind a car and points a gun at you, there has probably been an assault.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is not an category of intentional tort:


A) assault
B) murder
C) false imprisonment
D) battery
E) invasion of privacy

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Joe goes to a bar. He gets into an argument with Danny about the merits of Monday Night Football. They start to fight and Joe ends up kissing the barroom floor. Joe can sue Danny:


A) for assault and battery and probably win
B) for battery only and probably win
C) but Danny will probably successfully argue self-defense
D) but Danny will probably successfully claim the defense of excused harm
E) for damage to reputation because everyone laughed at him

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a person intends to act to cause a harmful or offensive contact, he is liable for the tort of:


A) assault
B) false imprisonment
C) defamation
D) duress
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is not an intentional tort involving interference with personal rights:


A) defamation
B) false imprisonment
C) nuisance
D) mental distress
E) malicious prosecution

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

With regard to torts, New Zealand differs from the United States in that:


A) personal injury tort suits are not allowed
B) there are no mega-damage awards
C) injured parties are compensated from a social insurance fund
D) all of the other specific choices
E) none of the other specific choices

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Tort law evolves through time by court decisions that reflect social values and community standards.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Most tort suits arise from:


A) customer ignorance
B) failure to plan for unexpected catastrophes
C) natural disasters
D) repeated failure to comply with industry regulations
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Suppose a surgeon is sued for negligence by a patient for having accidentally botched an operation. The standard that applies to the surgeon is the reasonable person, which means:


A) strict liability
B) the care expected of a skilled surgeon under the circumstances
C) the care expected of a reasonable person under the circumstances
D) the care expected of any person under the circumstances
E) none of the other choices; negligence law does not apply to physicians

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The doctrine of ____ permits damages to be decreased by the percentage of plaintiffs' injuries caused by plaintiff's negligence.


A) substantial factor
B) proximate cause
C) intentional negligence
D) intervening conduct
E) comparative advantage

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Torts based on negligence protect people from:


A) harm from others' unintentional but legally careless conduct
B) willful disregard for customer safety
C) accidental consumer injury due to the misuse of a product
D) all of the specific choices
E) none of the other specific choices

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The tort of printed or written defamatory communication is:


A) slander
B) conversion
C) privilege
D) negligence
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following would be an invasion of privacy:


A) the publication of a person's photograph without permission
B) illegally wiretapping a person's phone
C) publishing a story about an individual based on false information
D) publicly revealing a person's personal debt information
E) all of the other choices are invasions of privacy

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Evidence that shows a person's conduct is the reason why an event happened may establish the cause-in-fact of negligent tort.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty Products, involving an adhesive that did not work as claimed, the appeals court held that the claim of negligent misrepresentation:


A) failed because the defendant only recommended a product made by another company
B) failed because the defendant obtained no financial gain by the bad decision
C) failed because the plaintiff is a sophisticated business and could evaluate the product
D) could proceed because the defendant may have negligently provided false information
E) could proceed because the defendant intended to extract a large payment from the plaintiff based on false information

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The proximate cause of an injury is the ____ cause of the injury.


A) legal
B) definite
C) probable
D) most likely
E) foreseeable

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 161 - 180 of 465

Related Exams

Show Answer