FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 9: Licences and Proprietary Estoppel

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 21

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

the licence of the sort found in 'licence coupled with a grant' cases has an existence independent of the property right granted.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 22

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

detriment without any assurance can be enough to found a claim in estoppel.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 23

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

The Court of Appeal in Ashburn Anstalt v. Arnold confirmed that licences are not proprietary interest.

a licensor can make a claim for possession against a trespasser even if not in existing possession. Justify your answer by reference to the case law.

an equity by estoppel can be protected against a purchaser by entry as a notice on the register.

Need the detriment be purely financial?

In which court was King v. David Allen and Sons, Billposting decided?

What remedy was given to satisfy the equity in Wayling v. Jones?

it is necessary to know the precise geographical extent of a plot before a promise that someone will inherit that plot can amount to a sufficiently certain representation to give rise to an estoppel.