Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Void as an illegal violation of a statute.
B) Valid as a reasonable restraint on trade.
C) Unenforceable as a violation of public policy.
D) Binding as fair protection.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) is automatically unenforceable.
B) consists largely of boilerplate provisions, such as a standard-form insurance policy.
C) is a contract that exhibits either procedural or substantive unconscionability.
D) is a contract containing multiple exculpatory clauses.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) in order to obtain an injunction it is necessary for the employer to show that actual damage has occurred.
B) covenants not to compete are presumptively valid, and they are enforceable to the extent they are reasonable.
C) the question of reasonableness of a restraint requires consideration of such circumstances as the subject matter of the contract, the purpose to be served, the situation of the parties, the extent of the restraint, and the specialization of the business.
D) Two of these answers are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Where the aggrieved party was unaware of the illegality.
B) Where a party withdraws from an illegal agreement prior to performance.
C) Where the agreement is with an unlicensed attorney.
D) Where one of the parties is less at fault than the other.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Al is in violation of the sale agreement, which contained restrictions that would probably be held to be valid.
B) the agreement is invalid, because it is an illegal restraint on trade.
C) the agreement is illegal, because it is a violation of public policy.
D) the two-year provision is likely to be held invalid, because it is too long a period of time.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) unconscionable contract and therefore illegal.
B) illegal wagering agreement.
C) agreement to obstruct justice and therefore illegal.
D) illegal restraint of trade.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) out of luck because the clause was communicated to her.
B) out of luck because she should have insured the package.
C) likely to collect from DP since exculpatory clauses always violate public policy.
D) likely to collect from DP because it attempted to excuse intentional and reckless behavior.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) procedural unconscionability.
B) substantive unconscionability.
C) adhesion.
D) exculpatory clauses.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Carl would probably win on the basis of promissory estoppel since he has detrimentally relied upon Ron's representation that he would not bid.
B) since Carl is less at fault than Ron, the court will likely award Carl damages.
C) the agreement will not be enforced by the courts because it violates public policy.
D) the agreement will not be enforced by the courts because it obstructs the administration of justice.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 70
Related Exams