Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Who usually enters into employment contracts and what provision is commonly included regarding possible restraint of trade? Explain the purpose of such provisions.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Salespeople, management personnel, and o...

View Answer

Claudia sells her highly successful hair salon to Carl. In the sales contract, Claudia agrees never to open a hair salon in the state. Which of the following best describes this contract clause?


A) Void as an illegal violation of a statute.
B) Valid as a reasonable restraint on trade.
C) Unenforceable as a violation of public policy.
D) Binding as fair protection.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Many states impose no limit on the rate of interest that may be charged on loans to corporations.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An agreement to pay a public officer something extra for performing his official duty is enforceable.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Specific lender usury statutes rather than the general usury statute generally apply to real estate mortgages and small consumer loans.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A contract of adhesion:


A) is automatically unenforceable.
B) consists largely of boilerplate provisions, such as a standard-form insurance policy.
C) is a contract that exhibits either procedural or substantive unconscionability.
D) is a contract containing multiple exculpatory clauses.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

American courts generally will enforce a gambling agreement.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In considering a covenant not to compete in an employment contract, the court in the case of Payroll Advance, Inc. v. Yates said in its opinion:


A) in order to obtain an injunction it is necessary for the employer to show that actual damage has occurred.
B) covenants not to compete are presumptively valid, and they are enforceable to the extent they are reasonable.
C) the question of reasonableness of a restraint requires consideration of such circumstances as the subject matter of the contract, the purpose to be served, the situation of the parties, the extent of the restraint, and the specialization of the business.
D) Two of these answers are correct.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Bargains are illegal if they violate a crime or tort but not if they are merely against public policy.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under which of the following circumstances would a court be unlikely to enforce the illegal contract?


A) Where the aggrieved party was unaware of the illegality.
B) Where a party withdraws from an illegal agreement prior to performance.
C) Where the agreement is with an unlicensed attorney.
D) Where one of the parties is less at fault than the other.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

a. State and local governments require licenses for certain businesses and professional activities. Explain the difference between a regulatory licensing statute and a licensing statute enacted to raise revenue. b. Explain the significance in contract law between a regulatory license and a revenue raising license. c. Give an example of each type of licensing statute.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

a. A regulatory licensing statute is ena...

View Answer

Al, an accountant, has a tax service and accounting business in Redwood City. He decides to move to Center City, which is 150 miles away and sells his accounting practice to Able and Baker, a CPA firm. In the sale contract, he agrees that he will refrain from practicing accounting anywhere within a 60-mile radius of Redwood City for a period of two years. However, on weekends he returns to his house in Redwood City, and when clients call him, he meets with them in his home. In this case:


A) Al is in violation of the sale agreement, which contained restrictions that would probably be held to be valid.
B) the agreement is invalid, because it is an illegal restraint on trade.
C) the agreement is illegal, because it is a violation of public policy.
D) the two-year provision is likely to be held invalid, because it is too long a period of time.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is the legal effect of an agreement that is criminal, tortious, or otherwise contrary to public policy, and why does it have that effect?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Such an agreement is illegal and unenfor...

View Answer

A contract that requires a person to commit a tort will be enforced by the courts.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Archie bets his friend Jerry $100 that the Packers will win the next Super Bowl. This is an:


A) unconscionable contract and therefore illegal.
B) illegal wagering agreement.
C) agreement to obstruct justice and therefore illegal.
D) illegal restraint of trade.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Divided Parcel (DP) includes the following on its mailing receipts: "We are not responsible for any damages to packages whether or not through the intentional or reckless fault or negligence of our employees. Send packages at your own risk." Mary reads this clause but sends her watch back to the manufacturer to be repaired anyway. The watch is destroyed when the DP driver uses the package for a ball and tosses it to his buddy. Mary is:


A) out of luck because the clause was communicated to her.
B) out of luck because she should have insured the package.
C) likely to collect from DP since exculpatory clauses always violate public policy.
D) likely to collect from DP because it attempted to excuse intentional and reckless behavior.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Code and the Restatement both contain definitions of what constitutes "unconscionable" conduct.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Nanette wanted to purchase a new car and found one she liked at Minson Motors. Several important contractual terms were buried in the written agreement and some of the meaning of the contract was obscured by legal jargon. The contract involved:


A) procedural unconscionability.
B) substantive unconscionability.
C) adhesion.
D) exculpatory clauses.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Carl and Ron both work in road construction. They know that several jobs are going to be up for public bids, and agree between themselves that Carl will bid on one job and Ron will bid on the other, so that they both have work for the summer. When the bids are opened, Carl realizes that Ron has bid on both jobs. Ron is awarded both contracts. If Carl now wants to sue Ron for breach of contract:


A) Carl would probably win on the basis of promissory estoppel since he has detrimentally relied upon Ron's representation that he would not bid.
B) since Carl is less at fault than Ron, the court will likely award Carl damages.
C) the agreement will not be enforced by the courts because it violates public policy.
D) the agreement will not be enforced by the courts because it obstructs the administration of justice.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The law does not provide a remedy for the breach of an unenforceable agreement.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 21 - 40 of 70

Related Exams

Show Answer