A) Per se violations
B) Purposeful violations
C) Consumer protection violations
D) Expedient violations
E) Business contemplation violations
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Section 1 of the Sherman Act
B) Section 2 of the Sherman Act
C) Section 3 of the Sherman Act
D) Section 2 of the Clayton Act
E) Section 1 of the Clayton Act
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court, relying on Verizon Commc'ns Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. 14 Trinko, ruled that the publishers had engaged in a horizontal price fixing conspiracy but that Apple was not liable because the price fixing was at a different level of competition.
B) The court ruled that the agreement was a technically a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy but not a violation of the Sherman Act because the presence of a strong competitor justifies such an arrangement (the "strong competitor exemption") .
C) The court ruled that the agreement was a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy and thus a violation of the Sherman Act.
D) The court ruled that because the agreement was within a statutory exemption to antitrust laws, it was not illegal and Apple had not violated the Sherman Act.
E) The court ruled that the newness of the market and few competitors necessitated some sort of price fixing to encourage efficiency in the market.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Primary-line injury
B) Secondary-line injury
C) Tertiary-line injury
D) Sherman injury
E) Price-war injury
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) "mergerites"
B) cartels
C) oligopolies
D) Keiretsu
E) monopolies
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Attempts to monopolize
B) Mergers
C) Vertical price fixing
D) Horizontal price fixing
E) Bid rigging
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Quick-look
B) Purposeful
C) Justifiable
D) Necessary
E) Gracious
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The purposeful availment rule
B) The restraint of trade rule
C) The anti-competitive rule
D) The best-business defense rule
E) The rule of reason analysis
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Product
B) Consumer
C) Offered
D) Utilized
E) Disputed
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Securities and Exchange Act
B) Section 4 of the Clayton Act
C) Section 10 of the Sherman Act
D) Section 7 of the Clayton Act
E) Section 7 of the Sherman Act
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The purpose of antitrust law is to encourage economic efficiency.
B) An accumulation of economic power can lead to an accumulation of political power, which leads to political consequences for consumers.
C) Concentrated economic power does not necessarily lead to political consequences and companies should not be punished for their success.
D) To foster competition, a few powerful sellers should dominate the economy.
E) Great economic power leads to greater efficiency that translates to lower costs to consumers.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) competition
B) specialized
C) economic
D) production
E) market
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court upheld the continued used of the bright line per se rule of illegality for all vertical restrictions.
B) That the rule-of-reason should always be applied when vertical restrictions are involved.
C) That the rule-of-reason standard should be applied in a vertical restriction case unless departure from the rule is justified based upon a demonstrable economic effect.
D) That a per se rule of illegality is applied in a vertical restriction case unless departure from the rule is justified based upon a demonstrable economic effect.
E) That the per se rule of illegality is applied in a vertical restriction case only when a manufacturing defendant is involved; otherwise, the rule-of-reason test applies.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Chicago School
B) Marxist School
C) Efficiency School
D) Competition School
E) Surety School
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Every person who makes any contract in violation of the Sherman Act is guilty of a felony.
B) The limit on fines for a corporation found in violation of the Sherman Act is $10,000,000.
C) The Sherman Act only applies to business practices that restrain trade or commerce only within the United States.
D) The limit on fines for a person found in violation of the Sherman Act is $350,000.
E) The courts have determined the Sherman Act to prohibit efforts by competitors to fix prices, restrict output, and exclude rival companies.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Their business will fail without the acquisition.
B) Their business will become more efficient with the acquisition.
C) Competition will not be harmed by their acquisition.
D) Competition will be helped by their acquisition.
E) Their competitors have acquiesced to the acquisition.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, they violated Section 1.
B) Yes, they violated Section 2.
C) No, there is no violation because they are not engaged in intrastate commerce.
D) No, there is no violation because they have not established a monopoly.
E) No, there is no violation because at least three businesses must be involved in order to establish a violation of the Sherman Act.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the prohibited conduct occurred.
B) That the prohibited conduct occurred and the proper amount of economic harm.
C) That there is an unambiguous presumption of unfair trust activity.
D) That trust activity is likely to dilute efficiency among the competition.
E) An amount of economic harm meeting standards set by the Sherman Act itself.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) To stop trusts from unfairly restricting market competition.
B) To stop trusts from acting inefficiently.
C) To create exemptions from excessive government regulation in order to spur economic growth.
D) To create government-sponsored monopolies to compete with powerful corporations.
E) To regulate interstate commerce.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 87
Related Exams