Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) illegal per se.
B) a tying arrangement, which is always judged by rule of reason.
C) either illegal per se or judged by the rule of reason depending on the economic power of the seller and the amount of interstate commerce in cleaner bags affected.
D) no violation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) was intended to stop certain trade practices before they become restraints of trade.
B) added criminal sanctions to the Sherman Act.
C) repealed the Robinson-Patman Act.
D) included labor organizations in its coverage.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) vertical price maintenance.
B) horizontal group boycott.
C) vertical market allocation.
D) horizontal price fixing.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) horizontal price fixing.
B) vertical price fixing.
C) vertical market allocation.
D) a group boycott.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) prohibits using the rule of reason test in judging joint ventures in research and development of new technology.
B) is designed to clear up uncertainty about the legality of joint ventures.
C) now requires treble damages if joint ventures are formed in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
D) All of these.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) may, among other things, depress prices.
B) stabilize prices.
C) raise prices.
D) All of these.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) there is no violation since there is no express agreement to boycott Cayuga.
B) illegality may be inferred from this conduct.
C) there is no concerted action.
D) this is horizontal market allocation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Sherman Act.
B) Clayton Act.
C) Robinson-Patman Act.
D) Federal Trade Commission Act.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the plaintiff need only show that the type of restraint occurred.
B) the defendants may defend on the basis that the restraint was reasonable.
C) the court is required to conduct extensive economic analysis into the type of harm caused or the business excuse for use of the restraint.
D) the plaintiff must prove that the restraint limited competition.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a per se price-fixing violation of the Sherman Act.
B) not a violation of the Sherman Act, because it has been made by a professional association.
C) not a violation of the Sherman Act, because a fee is different from a price.
D) subject to the rule of reason.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a seller's refusal to deal with any particular buyer.
B) a manufacturer who refuses to sell to a retailer who persists in selling below the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
C) when two or more firms that have market power agree not to deal with a third party, thereby eliminating competition.
D) cooperative agreements designed to increase economic efficiency and render markets more competitive.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 80
Related Exams