Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

In Britain,illegally obtained evidence is admitted in court,but the:


A) defendant cannot be imprisoned for the crime.
B) officer at fault is subject to internal department discipline.
C) agency involved must pay a heavy fine to the defendant.
D) officer at fault must pay a heavy fine to the defendant.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a neighbor had conducted the search and found the evidence,then called the officers,it is admissible,because it is


A) a private search.
B) fruit of the poisonous tree.
C) independent source.
D) an inevitable source.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Is the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule weaker or stronger today compared to the periods of the Weeks and Mapp decisions? Why has this occurred? Do you think this is a good or bad trend? Explain your position and provide examples.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule i...

View Answer

Police today are more professional and have more training as a result of:


A) the plea bargaining rule.
B) the silver platter doctrine.
C) the exclusionary rule.
D) both the pleas bargaining rule and silver platter doctrine.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to_________ police misconduct.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The exclusionary rule applies to illegally seized evidence (the primary evidence).

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is an alternative to the exclusionary rule?


A) A civil tort action against the government
B) An independent review board in the executive branch
C) Adoption of an expanded good faith exception
D) All of the answers are correct.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is an exception to the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine?


A) Golden platter
B) Harmless error
C) Purged taint
D) Standing

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Evidence that is obtained through the use of illegally obtained evidence is called the_________ .

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

fruit of t...

View Answer

The exclusionary rule provides that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is:


A) admissible in legal proceeding if it is used to prove a fact.
B) admissible in a civil suit brought by an individual for breach of contract.
C) inadmissible a criminal proceeding to prove a fact by the prosecution.
D) inadmissible in a criminal proceeding as evidence of guilt.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Mapp v.Ohio and Miranda v.Arizona were important in the additional powers of discretion they gave to law enforcement officers

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter misconduct by:


A) defense attorneys.
B) judges.
C) police.
D) prosecutors.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If the officers obtained verbal consent,but the department policy required a written consent,it is not a violation of the exclusionary rule,because


A) the agency rule is invalid.
B) the agency rule cannot contradict the constitutional rule.
C) it is independent source.
D) it violates an agency rule,but not the constitutional rule.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

For this evidence to be admissible and not a violation of the exclusionary rule,


A) no search warrant is needed,because of the principle of inevitable discovery.
B) no search warrant is needed,because it is independent source.
C) a search warrant would have been needed.
D) no search warrant is needed,because the actions occurring in the apartment were illegal.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Illegally seized evidence and the "fruit of the poisonous tree" are:


A) admissible under certain exceptions.
B) not subject to the exclusionary rule.
C) never admissible under any circumstances.
D) None of the answers are correct.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

U.S.Supreme Court decisions strongly suggest that the exclusionary rule applies only to Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following options for the exclusionary rule do you think is best? Explain your position. A.Totally abolish the exclusionary rule B.Create more exceptions to the exclusionary rule C.Abolish the exceptions to the exclusionary rule

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

I do not think any of these options is b...

View Answer

The prosecution must show beyond a reasonable doubt that the evidence erroneously admitted did not contribute to the conviction in order to prove:


A) automatic reversal.
B) harmless error.
C) mandatory remand.
D) inevitable reversal.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The 1914 decision in which the U.S.Supreme Court decided that the exclusionary rule applied in all federal prosecutions was _________v.United States.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

To prove_________ error,the prosecution must show beyond a reasonable doubt that the evidence erroneously admitted did not contribute to the conviction.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 101 - 120 of 120

Related Exams

Show Answer